by Ven, S. Dhammika,
Singapore -- Buddhism is my religion and has
been for nearly 43 years. I consider the Buddha to have been the
greatest mind in human history. I believe that the Dhamma is the closest
humanity has come to ethical and spiritual perfection.
I
have been teaching Dhamma for about 25 years and I have never got
tired of it, and I still discover aspects of it that I had not noticed
before. As an outgrowth of all this I have also developed a deep
interest in Buddhist societies and cultures and have been fortunate
enough to visit nearly every region where Buddhism prevails. During my
travels I have generally found Buddhists to be open, gentle, generous
and kindly folk.
But I am not blind. As samsaric beings Buddhists have their
defilements just as people of other faiths do. They are capable of being
stupid and greedy, prejudiced and uncaring, provoked and provoking,
self-centred and inflexible, tradition-bound and superstitious.
They practice their religion as often as they fail to practice it –
just as people of other faiths do. Despite this there has long been the
illusion in the west that Buddhists, unique amongst humanity, practice
their religion with complete fidelity - that because the Buddha taught
gentleness, understanding and love, Buddhists follow these teachings
unfailingly.
Well, it looks like those with such illusions might be about to
be disillusioned. It started some years ago with news reports of Sri
Lankan monks being involved in racist politics and ethnic violence.
The
Dorje Shugden and the Karmapa rumpus had little impact on public
opinion because of the obscure issues involved, although they shocked
and perhaps disillusioned some western Tibetan Buddhists.
Then the riots in Tibet gave a rather un-Shangri La picture of the troubles in that country.
Now it’s the ethnic riots in Burma. I quite understand that thoughtful people are deeply disturbed by these happenings.
I am too. But there is an added dimension to the reports about these
as opposed to troubles beyond the Buddhist world. And it is this.
Commentators and observers continually express their surprised to
discover that Buddhists, monks included, can be provoked to violence,
that they have chauvinistic feelings, that they are capable prejudices,
and that they can resort to violence.
On the one hand this disillusioning worries me. Why? Because it tends
to happen that when an illusion gives way to reality there is often a
strong reaction in the other direction. When the deluded finally see the
real situation they do not blame themselves for being unrealistic, they
blame that which they were previously deluded about.
I suspect that Buddhists, and by implication Buddhism, previously
held so unrealistically high is gradually going to be put down far
lower than it should be.
On the other hand I am not entirely unhappy that a more realistic
view of Buddhists and Buddhist lands is beginning to emerge. Why?
Because I have long seen the danger, not to say the foolishness, in the
“ethnic” approach to Dhamma.
When a western monk in the west asks to be addressed as Ajahn or
Gelong, Sayadaw, Roshi or Sensei rather than their English equivalent he
is identifying himself, not just as a Buddhist, but with a particular
ethnic expression of Buddhism.
When they chant in the Tibetan or the Burmese or the Chinese way the
same impression can be created. When you tie yourself to a particular
culture or country you involve yourself in people’s minds with that
culture or country. And when that country or culture looks bad people
see Buddhism as bad.
Dhamma is universal, it transcends culture and ethnicity. The
practice of the Dhamma is not the special preserve of any particular
ethnic group.
Let us practice the Buddha’s teaching, not Thai Buddhism, not Tibetan
Buddhism, not Burmese Buddhism or any other culturally-specific
expression of the Dhamma. Let us practice the Dhamma with a minimum of
cultural trappings. |
http://sdhammika.blogspot.com/2013/06/dhamma-or-ethnic-buddhism.html?m=1, June 22, 2013
|
sourse:THE BUDDHIST CHANNEL |
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment